Heritage

Heritage has become a dirty word in Wellington and it cannot be allowed to remain so. In 2021 I wrote a post that explored my view of how heritage can be defined and how it can be used.

To me heritage is using physical items to anchor and communicate the stories we wish to pass to our successors. What we restrict from changing must serve this aim or it instead shows our succesors that we are pretending that nothing changes.

As a councilor I would drive council to adopt a clearer policy of what the intent of heritage recognition is. It cannot continue to be used to hobble any changes.

Council must be willing to accept the demolition of heritage buildings if it helps create a more affordable and liveable city. It has to be for a strong benefit however, it cannot just be rubber stamping demolition because it's easy.

I would push for council to adopt heritage policies that place accessibilty and safety ahead of appearence. Just because our ancestors pretended that less abled people existed does not mean we should accept it now. The main entrance of heritage buildings must be accessible to all people, even if it means we have to replace doors and steps. To balance this we should require that any alterations are done in a sympathetic style. Installing shiny sliding doors in a building from the late 1800s should not be acceptable.

I would work with Heritage NZ to identify opportunities to invest in research and development of new restoration and maintenance techniques. Processes like additive manufacturing should be examined to see if they can reduce the cost of maintaining heritage items.

I would push for council to adopt a policy that at least half of all heritage items recognized by the council to have been independently identified by local iwi and hapu. Our current heritage listing effectively hide the contribution of anyone but European immigrants. This must change.

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Miscellaneous Aims

  • Work with street vendors to identify areas where we could place infrastructure like parking, power, water

  • Work with the unions and council management to identify how we can incentivise new ideas for doing things better

    • Options like providing the team that identifies the improvement a cut of the savings for a period of time. Also include the unions in that cut to help encourage them

  • Work with businesses to encourage them to provide time for staff to make submissions to council

  • Push to have the “Commercial sensitivity” argument heavily curtailed when it comes to OIA requests

    • Options like restricting its use on contracts for 12 months after the signing

  • Work with unions to identify areas where process improvements can be made

    • Union members have a massive amount of institutional knowledge that should be leveraged for mutual benefit. This is not a zero sum game

  • Explore the allocation of a ring fenced experimental budget for council staff to use to explore new tools and ways of doing things. Leaving councillor hands out of it.

    • Would still want to make sure that the reason for using the funds to try something out are clear and have a solid set of metrics.

  • Work with council leadership and workers to identify if there are ways we can introduce even more incremental efforts.

    • We would have to be willing to accept more cases of rework even when things are going well

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Amalgamation

It needs to be done

It is a bad joke that the Wellington Region is split into competing councils when so much of the infrastructure and lives of its people are spread throughout the entire area.

Why?

The current setup pretends that every city is a standalone being that has no deep connection to neighbouring areas. This cannot be any further from the truth. People throughout the region commute to other parts of the region for work or education. Businesses operate across all councils, not just one. We travel throughout the region for recreation.

Already transport and water infrastructure is handled at a regional level with little direct control from each local council.

The aim of Amalgamation must be to better use what resources we have. Enabling us to get more done while listening to just as many or more as decisions are made.

How?

The biggest risk of amalgamation is it is done shortsightedly and pretends that we can just take one council's systems and apply it to the whole. We have to carefully examine and compare how each council handles different functions and select the best.

We can even use this a chance to address Te Tiriti reparations through giving hapu direct representation on such a regional council as well as local influence over land.

Amalgamation should not be used as a cudgel to stupidly cut staff numbers and representation. Any simplification in processes should be used to free up the hardworking staff to focus on the needed services that local government provides. Amalgamation must free up resources so that council staff can experiment with improvements instead of being penny-pinched and forced to use systems that are useless at best. Amalgamation must free up representatives to focus on more topics instead of fighting the same discussions in parallel 5 or 6 times.

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Why me?

Highest priorities

The biggest common factor impacting Wellington right now and for the past couple decades is the total and utter failure to ensure there is affordable and safe housing for the residents of and migrants to Wellington. This is the biggest issue I would work towards if elected to council. Whatever we can do to reduce the cost and improve the safety of living in this amazing area needs to be used. Even if it means changes that some will not like. Otherwise we are choosing to kill this city.

Beyond this I want to place pressure on council and businesses to improve the access and usability of public and active transport modes. Freeing up residents of all ages to travel without dependence on friends and family will improve the culture of Wellington but also its economic strengths. These actions then lead into the major work needed to reduce our impact on the environment due to global warming. Council has a part to play in driving the changes needed to reduce our emissions and waste. Global warming is real and it is already impacting us. Our successors will be impacted even more if we do not work to address it.

All these efforts need to be investigated and executed in the context of Te Tiriti. This is an area I have ideas BUT where I need to spend time with mana whenua to understand the context better. With the aim of finding options that are beneficial to us as a whole, even where they will be uncomfortable for those that have historically benefited from our predecessors lack of ethics.

Below you will find more details on the various ideas and aims I have for our amazing area of the world. All are driven by the priorities above.




Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Te Tiriti

I want to the council to help turn the relationship between the Crown and Mana Whenua into a tue partnership.

To do this the first thing I would do is spend a significant fraction of my time as a councillor listening to the iwi and hapu of Wellington to understand their interpretations of Te Tiriti and take their guidance on how to understand it better. From there I would want to work with the various groups to address these aims and historical wrongs. Even in cases where the council, as the representative of the Crown, may need to acknowledge precedence of choie to mana whenua.

One distinct thing I would push council to adopt is a true billingual organization. All council staff should be able to converse comfortably in Te Reo as well as English. This can be done through requiring it for senior roles as well as having an ongoing requirement for all staff to reach a conversational level over a period of time from employment. With support for staff to reach that point.

All council communications should be in a mimimum of Te Reo and English. I would also push to for council to explore and understand what would be needed to release all council regulations and by-laws in bother Te Reo and English. As opposed to the current state when the only binding wording is in English. This will not be easy but I do think it's important enough to do.

Beyond this I cannot have any details as it all depends on getting up to speed with the conversations that have been had, the actions that have been taken, and understanding/discovering what actions will need to be taken. We did not get into this situation overnight and it will not be addressed overnight.

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Housing

Housing

Housing is Wellington is by far our largest crisis. It is killing the city as people increasingly have to choose between emigration or living in slums unless they are lucky and have purchased one of the few homes for sale.

To bring Wellington into the city we know it can be we MUST address housing affordabilty and safety. Without people an economy does not exist. To fully fix this will take many years and we need to start now.

Resource consents MUST be made simpler to get approved. This does not mean that we remove regulations as is often called for. It means that developers, land owners, etc. need to be able to have confidence that a submission will be approved before submitting it. Guidance needs to be clarified where problems are often found and such information communicated clearly to all involved.

Disputes on consents should be examined to see how many are on aesthetic things such as designs or colours. Such disputes should be ignored as art and general preferences change over time.

Disputes around things such shading or height should have a set of responses for developers to apply. Just as we require Wellington Internation Airport to fund sound insulation in nearby properties we could require developers to fund the installation of lighting or awnings for neighbouring impacted properties. However neighbouring land owners cannot be allowed to stop the creation of affordable and safe housing because they have some belief their title on the land extends to neighbouring properties.

Council MUST work with other councils and place pressure on central government to approve modular housing components so that council officers do not have to approve every little design or design change. Councils need to pressure central government on designating building material standards in other countries as equivalent to NZ standards where equivalent. Currently we are held hostage by so few companies being willing to go through the approval process to get material approved for use in NZ.

Mixed use developments should be prioritized over single use construction. COVID has accelerated the move to more distributed working arrangements with many people working from home for part of the working week. Mixed use developments also encourage communities to grow.

To encourage densification council should examine using approval fees to put a large premium construction of standalone housing. We must move towards more efficient forms of housing not just for reducing the cost of construction but also for ecological reasons.

I would push for council to invest in the construction of low rise apartments on council owned land. Redevelopment of locations such as community centres could have apartments built on floors above the previous use, creating a mixed use development.

Council also needs to identify ways that housing can be intensified even if the infrastructure is not yet able to handle the peak demands that could be expected. Developments can be developed to contain systems for buffering such demands so that they do not overload that point in the system. Water, waste, and power have options.

Cities, businesses, economies, etc. exist because of people. To support all of this you MUST support their ability to actually live in the area. Without changes we will complete the recreation of the landed gentry from Europe. This is not a result that I will ever accept as it belittles and enslaves one group to another.

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Transport

Like most cities, Wellington has an addiction to private motor vehicles that is destroying our ability to interact with others as well as do business. To address this we MUST prioritise the movement of people and goods in the most overall efficient ways possible.

To do this council must prioritise transport investment in the following order.

  1. Pedestrian
  2. Cyclist/Micromobility
  3. Public transport
  4. Freight/Commercial
  5. Private motor vehicle

But people need cars, vans, etc.!?

Prioritising other modes of transport is not a ban on private motor vehicles. There is only so much land available to move people and goods. This space must be prioritised to do the most good possible. Even if it means that for users of some modes will have to adjust how they do things. There will still have to be space allocated for loading and unloading of freight and space allocated for those unable to use other modes. And we must be willing to support people during this change that are unable to quickly replace their current way of moving around with another.

Something that is rarely highlighted is that as infrastructure is improved for pedestrians, cyclists, and public transport. The ability for those with less mobility to use it improves. This is something that has been seen in many countries as they increase the quality and amount of things like pedestrian areas, protected cycle lanes, and improved public transport stops.

Public roads are a public commons. It is a tragedy of the commons that storage of private motor vehicles has become so expected that many treat it as a right. Our current use of roads has turned them into rivers where humans cannot exist. They exist only for cars and this has helped damage any sense of community as we are encouraged to live our lives in metal and glass bubbles. Never interacting with those that live around us.

Cost efficiency

Cars have been getting bigger, our population is increasing, and there is nowhere to put more roads and parking without spending billions of dollars. EVs will not fix this as they are still the same size and even heavier than the vehicles they replace. The cost to maintain roads already eats up a large section of the council budget and this will increase at a faster rate if we continue to encourage larger and heavier vehicles in the city.

In comparison reallocating road space to forms of transport like cycling, scooters, and walking, will not only move more people but also dramatically reduce the maintenance costs for council. If you seriously wish to lower the amount you pay in rates then we need to reduce how much road space is dedicated to so many heavy vehicles.

Pedestrians

Cars do not buy dinner, you cannot park right out front the store you want to go to in a mall, you cannot drive up and down the aisles of a supermarket, we don't park our cars in our living rooms or bedrooms. It is people that actually buy things and live in a place. So we must prioritize the movement and existence of people in transport.

Council must adopt changes that prioritize pedestrians at crossings and intersections. There should be a maximum waiting time so that people are not encouraged to walk in front of traffic. And begging buttons must be removed with pedestrian crossings being triggered automatically either via sensors or on a timer.

I would push for the adoption of 30kph as the default speed limit throughout urban Wellington. This is to increase the safety of pedestrians as well encourage use of other modes of transport. Speeds should only be allowed to be higher where pedestrians and micromobility modes are safely separated. Lower speeds will also help reduce the noise and particulate emissions of vehicles which are a major source of pollution within Wellington.

Council must adopt maximum crossing distances between footpaths. Expecting people to cross 4 or 6 lanes in a handful of seconds only encourages people to drive. People of all physical abilities should feel that they can safely cross roadways in the time available.

"Courtesy Crossings" must be removed from use within Wellington and replaced by full pedestrian crossings. They not only confuse all involved but still prioritize private vehicles drivers. Meaning pedestrians are at the mercy of drivers stopping.

We should also adopt a policy of maximum distances between pedestrian crossings. Current regulations allow pedestrians to cross if not near a designated crossing. But so many of our roads are completely unfit to support the safe crossing of pedestrians. Requiring them to appear out from behind parked vehicles or cross multiple lanes of fast flowing dense traffic.

Pedestiran crossings should be elevated by default. This is something that should be worked through with emergency services so as to not impede their work needlessly.

Encourage the installation of pedestrian shelters or footpath coverings. Wellington weather can be nasty from time to time. The biggest threat for most of us is the sun however. Installation of more awnings or planting of trees will help create the shade needed to keep the sun off pedestrians. Such coverings can also be used to install solar panels, reducing the emissions from other generation modes as well as the cost of installation and maintance of shelters.

Footpaths must have a minimum width in urban areas. This width cannot include any disruption from walls, kerbs, posts, advertising boards, etc. Where footpath width cannot be maintained the roadway must be turned into a shared space that supports the safe mixing of foot and wheeled traffic. This width should be identified through consideration of existing requirements as well as working with groups that depend on clear footpaths such as sight limited, mobility limited, and parents. Parking must be secondary to maintaining a minimum width. Council workers must also be empowered to rapidly respond to issues that block footpaths such as overgrown vegetation, construction signage, and illegally parked vehicles. Rural areas such as Makara will need special consideration due to the distances covered and unlikeliness of pedestrians even if footpaths were installed.

Modern vehicles are increasing in size at an accelerating rate. When standing at a corner of an intersection it is often impossible to see beyond a few metres. This has to be addressed at it impossible for any vehicle travelling at speed to see a pedestrian, react, and stop with such short sightlines. Such vehicles have also been shown to be deadlier to pedestrians than older models that were smaller. If we do nothing we will see even fewer people walking around. Even in cases where they could have driven and parked nearby.

Cycling and micromobility

Cycling is where Wellington City will be able to make the biggest impact on our transport infrastructure. Especially with the massive uptake of e-bikes. Bikes provide an energy and space efficient mode of quick local transport that is not tied to a timetable or route.

For urban trips e-bikes are a car replacement. Their ability to flatten hills and make raging winds effectively disappear makes them a game changer for Wellington.

An increasing number of people in Wellington cannot afford to own and operate motor vehicles. These people still need to be able to move around Wellington city. Investment in cycling and micromobility infrastructure will support these people.

We always talk about how we want to support kids to be more independent. They can’t drive and public transport doesn’t exist in many areas even during the day. Investment in cycling infrastructure gives our children the ability to live without being tied to someone who owns a motor vehicle. This means education, socialising, and even work.

Cycling also provides a great way to increase the amount of exercise we do. Even e-bikes are shown to improve the health of their users. Improving the long term health of Wellington residents will reduce the sickness and chronic health problems many of us deal with. Freeing up our health funds to focus on other illnesses.

Council changes

The biggest thing the council can do right now is to support the accelerated rollout of the cycle network. This network will create something that is actually usable by the residents of Wellington. The haphazard collection of disconnected cycleways previous councils have created has been pointless. Without a network of connected paths, other changes are a waste of time and money. To encourage anyone but the most confident to cycle we must provide a way to get around that doesn't have a multi-tonne vehicle 30cm behind you.

I would push council to install secure cycle storage at stations and the core bus routes. This supports the ability for people to use a bike for the last kilometre and connect more of Wellington to the high frequency routes, increasing patronage. Secure storage could be supported through the use of the ticketing system in use by Metlink.

I would work with business groups to identify the best locations in urban centres for the installation of secure bike storage. This can be through installation on council owned protperty, reallocation of vehicle parking, or even installation on public areas of private property.

Wellington City Council should be directed to work with other local councils and central government to implement ways we can make purchase of e-bikes more accessible to residents. This could be through subsidies or even joint purchases or production runs to be sold on at cost. We should work with local bicycle shops and even car dealerships to see how this can best be done.

Council should explore incentives for installation of all sorts of bike storage by land and building owners. This could be through rates rebates depending on the capability of the storage or reallocation of on premise vehicle parking to bicycles.

Public transport

To improve public transport the biggest changes have to be done outside of what Wellington City Council has direct control over. This does not mean there is nothing the council can do.

Council should continue to work with other groups and local government bodies to apply pressure on central government to provide the ability to make the needed changes. This will also be helped through the councils of the Wellington region amalgamating into one.

Full time bus lanes and bus priority at junctions for all core routes must be adopted. This is something that can be done quickly and will make a massive impact on the reliability of services. Users of public transport must trust that it will run when it says it will run.

We must build all bus stops to have level boarding, safe road crossing, and the ability for vehicles to pull up completely parallel to the stop. Too many stops in Wellington are dangerous even for those who have full mobility. Every stop in must be safe enough that anyone can use them safely. This can be done in co-ordination with community and specialist groups to identify the priority of stops to fix. It will have to be a multi year project to do effectively.

Council should work with central government to adjust road regulations to prioritize the movement of buses in traffic. Such as pulling out of a stop and into the flow of traffic or from an intersection.

To make it easier to use public transport I would push for council to work with Metlink and Greater Wellington to install public toilets at all bus hubs. This is a small thing that can greatly increase the quality of life for residents of Wellington. Council should also work with Metlink and bus operators to identify other locations that could benefit from installation of public toilets.

The core bus routes as identified by Greater Wellington Regional Council must be updated to prioritize buses. Even if this means reducing the amount of on street parking.

Freight/Commercial

Large amounts of freight and equipment is hard to move on a bus or a bike. So we must make sure to allocate space to the vehicles that provide these important services.

I would work with council and businesses to identify core freight corridors throughout Wellington that can be better optimized for use by these vehicles. Reducing the amount that trucks have to accelerate or brake will reduce the wear and tear as well as emissions, especially noise. Even if such corridors have lower speeds to support adoption of active modes.

I would put forward the ability for large trucks to make use of segregated pathing like bus lanes. This could be expanded to tradespeople but would require a system to minimize abuse outside of the hours they are operated as tradespeople vehicles.

Private motor vehicle

No matter how much we wish we could move every trip into other modes, private vehicles will still be needed by some. So while they may be at the bottom of the priority list they cannot be ignored.

I would require council to work with groups that show a need for private vehicles that other modes cannot reasonably provide at the time. People such as those with mobility limitations, shift workers that work outside of hours that make other modes safe or even available, vital services that must be running at all times and may need specific people to travel at immediate notice.

Council must make sure that access for these people is not unduly disrupted. This can be through

  • making sure there is access to the areas needed by general traffic
  • using timed restrictions to allow mixed use outside of congested times
  • systems that can allow access to restrcited roadways for specified vehicles
  • dedicated parking at frequent distances for various users

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Climate

It's real, deal with it

If you believe Global Warming is a conspiracy or "won't be that bad"? Go vote for another candidate.

Global Warming is real and reports like the IPCC are sugar coating it due to politics. Every single worst case eestimate in it we've blown straight through.

Does this mean Wellington can avert it alone? Of course not. Yet we must do our part to reduce our emissions.

Pretending that individuals acting alone can change this is madness. An individual does not smelt steel, refine oil, build a car, or create fossil fuel polymers by themselves. Our response must be at the same population level that got us here.

Treat it seriously

I would push for a council that treats Climate Change seriously and not just a throwaway vote.

I would have Council treat the emissions that result in the purchases it makes just as seriously as it would a purchase that had raw sewerage streaming down our streets. This could be contracts that require vendors to dispose of any waste generated, packaging included. We could provide incentives to beat independently assesed emissions targets, and penalties for going past some limit.

This is a topic that Amalgamation will make simipler by being able to have a single set of processes and regulations for the entire region instead of a half dozen that designers and builders have to deal with.

Buildings

Wellington City Council owns or controls many buildings and much land around the city. This is a massive resource for local power production that is currently untapped. I would push for Council to install solar panels wherever feasbile. This is an area that can be done in co-operation with local business. Providing leases that garuntee a certain length of time and responsiblities for the parties involved.

Another big change that must be pushed to help reduce our emissions is the creation of more mixed use developments. The shorter the distance people have to travel to reach services such as entertainment, gorceries, council, retail, etc. the less we will emit. It is more efficient for a handful of freight vehicles to move goods into a few areas than it is for every person to travel throughout Wellington to specialised mega stores. This would require efforts with local business to identify how council can help reduce the costs of shipping and delivery without direct subsidies.

I would push council to adopt a system of fees that incentivizes efficient building design and construction. The fewer pressures a development puts on the environment the bigger the benefit. Things that can be considered could be

  • Reuse of local materials
  • Transport emissions of materials used
  • Creation emissions of materials used
  • Power, water, and waste pressures on local infrastructure
  • Incentivizing of active transport modes through secure storage
  • Direct emissions from building services

These incentives could also be used by existing buildings and facilities to provide rates reductions or discounted fees.

Transport

The biggest thing that needs to change in the short term is how we treat transport within Wellington. I would push for changes in how we treat vehicles in the urban areas of Wellington. These will require work with central government to enable local councils the ability to make these choices.

  • Congestion charging within the urban cores must be introduced. Funds raised through this will be ring fenced for infrastructure projects that reduce the need for individual motor vehicles.
  • Introduce resident parking throughout the city. Vehicles will be charged on a scale that increases based on weight, dimensions, and energy source.
    • Larger and heavier vehicles such as large SUVs and trucks have little place on urban roads.
    • Exemptions or concessions should be provided for people who do need vehicles to get around Wellington until other methods have improved. Such groups could include
      • Mobility impaired
      • Shift workers
      • Rural residents
  • Public and active transport modes would be prioritized wherever they come into conflict with private motor vehicles. This will mean that for some, trips will take longer. If the overall energy use is reduced this impact will be acceptable.

There is an ongoing effort to electrify the Council's vehicle fleet but I think this can be done even better. I would push for council to adjust to focusing the council vehicle fleet on electric bikes. Such bikes will be cheaper to own but even more importantly operate as they use a fraction of the power needed by heavy vehicles. These electric bikes would not just be the two wheel variety we are used to but also cargo bikes of the two, three, and even four wheeled variety. Bikes also reduce the number of council staff that have to have a vehicle license. This is important as fewer and fewer people get such licenses, artifically reducing the pool of candidates the council can hire from.

In an emergency bikes are also able to move faster and reach further than cars often can. Speeding up the ability for council to organize and respond to such emergencies.

I would push for the adoption of a default speed limit of 30kph in urban areas. This will support more people to feel safe whilst cycling. And as more EVs are adopted there will be less pressure for higher speeds to reduce gas emissions. Lower speeds will also reduce the wear and tear on brakes and tires, reducing the particulate emissions from them.

I will push council to not fall for the wish that EVs are the panacea to solve our emissions problem. EVs are generally heavier than fossil fueled vehicles which puts even more wear and tear on our roads, but also more wear and tear on brakes and tires. Such dust is an emission that impacts our immediate environment more than any CO2 or NOX gas. Reducing those emissions will reduce how much we poison our waterways every time it rains.

Unlike humans it is hard to move large freight movements onto other modes. To reduce the impact of freight on climate change I would push for the adoption of freight corridors where private motor vehicles are discouraged from entering. Reducing the amount of times that trucks have to accelerate or decelerate will make an impact on our emissions. Even when moving to EV trucks there are still large amounts of brake and tire dust emissions.

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

Waste

  • We are choking on non-biodegradable waste

  • No amount of feel good advertising will make the needed changes to reduce this

  • I would propose levies on single use packaging providers unless they collect at the point of sale to consumers AND then handle the waste.

    • For every x percent of single use waste handled the provider would have a rates rebate to match or something similar

    • The aim would be to target this in such a way that those importing the packaging into the Wellington region or producing it locally would be the ones to be stung. We do not want the pain to fall directly on the shoulders of smaller businesses where the larger ones can more easily handle the costs.

    • This may require cooperation with other councils as well as central government to empower the council to make such changes.

  • I would work to establish transfer stations in local centres where people can bring larger amounts of recycling instead of having to wait until the fortnightly pick up.

    • This would be useful for situations such as getting a delivery that has a large amount of cardboard packaging

    • Such stations must not support motor vehicles as they are already able to easily drop items off at the Happy Valley tip

    • These stations would then be able to be cleared daily or even multiple times a day if needed

    • Overflow areas would need to be considered in their design should it not be able to be cleared before filling up

    • This would also assist with reducing the number of plastic recycling bags needed

    • An idea to consider is the system used in the Netherlands where there are waste containers dug into the ground that can be lifted by a specially fitted truck and emptied into a trailer. This may or may not be feasible for Wellington but should be explored.

    • Such a system could be rolled out over a period of time without greatly impacting the current system.

  • I would like to work with Porirua City Council to see if Tawa residents could be able to use the landfill closer to them.

    • This could possibly be through a payment from WCC to PCC to cover extra costs

  • In general Wellington needs a unified physical waste handling provider.

  • I believe a non-profit CCO would be a good option to consider

    • However it may make more sense to have it as a department of WCC, sharing common requirements like payroll and employee support. If a joint council agreement cannot be reached.

  • I would like to investigate what options exist for ‘mining’ old landfills for resources. I expect many have examined this and found it currently wanting. I would like to understand why this likely not a useful option.

Water waste is much more complicated due to the existence of Wellington Water. We would have to work with them and the co-owning councils to identify how best we want to handle waste water. Depending on feasibility we could identify uses for grey water such as irrigation or street cleaning

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz

The arts and beautification

Why bother?

It is a function of local councils to manage the sensory impact of the environment we live in. This means council must spend money on public art and beautification. It must not be viewed as some thing that gets the first cut.

Housing housing housing

The biggest thing I believe the council can do to support the Arts in Wellington is to directly address the cost of living. It is utterly worthless funding workshop spaces, public art, or recreational areas, when so many in our city can barely afford to live or have any time to relax. The lack of affordable living in Wellington is directly killing the artistic environment that we have paraded for decades. With no free time only the tiny handful of fulltime professionals can ever hope to provide shows, performances, writings, etc.

Even for parks and gardens the costs of living makes it harder and harder for council to maintain these facilities. The more it costs for someone to live here the fewer staff can be hired. This then results in fewer facilities being able to be maintained. Closing parks, pools, community centres, walking paths, etc. Things that are important for making life in Wellington worth living.

Without affordable living every other effort will fail.

Other areas of support

As we address the cost of living there are other efforts I want the council to make to help create an environment that encourages artisitc expression and support residents and visitors in supporting our artists.

  • Work with busking and business groups to identify and build areas for busking
  • Support busking and smaller performance groups through subsidising donation/payment systems
  • Build a centralised feed where local groups and individuals can advertise their shows, performances, art, music, etc.
  • Reallocate space in heavily paved over areas for trees to create much more pleasent spaces.
  • Work with the gardens team to see if we can help community groups take ownership of gardens in their area. And how we could support such efforts.
  • Incentivize building and land owners to install public art. A mural on side of a 6 story concrete wall changes the way the area feels. We already have multiple examples of this in Wellington and it must be encouraged.
  • Ring fence funds to provide grants to inexperienced artists so they can focus on learning the skills needed to be successful. Otherwise we risk funds only ever going to the same handful of people for decades.
  • Providing a section of the budget for local hapu to decide where it is allocated.

Art and nature are important for making life worth living. Turning into a place where people work, sleep, and die must never be acceptable. Wellington is a place that has been proud of its artistic side in the past. We must show that pride through supporting it in return.

Authorised by James Sullivan. James@TFG.nz